I doubt I’m the only person who has a collection of books on grammar and word usage, and I certainly hope I’m not the only one who reads them for pleasure. There are a huge number out there and, of course, some are better than others. Some are more accessible, some are more entertaining, some are dry, some are vivid . . . and then some are the kinds of tomes you prop under a two-year old so they can reach the kitchen table. Ultimately, though, the book I keep coming back to–and the only user’s guide I keep within finger’s reach at my desk–is The Elements of Style by William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White.
It’s been a classic for so long. Literally generations have read through this book. It’s hard to mentally separate the authors’ names. In fact, the book is actually a 1959 revision by E.B. White of William Strunk’s 1918 original. It’s even been parodied, in 2007’s Spunk and Bite by Arthur Plotnik, and how often does a grammar book get that distinction?
I think that the reason this one is such a classic is because the writing is perfectly clear, the advice is solid, and it’s easy to find what you need. The Chicago Manual of Style, for example, is even more authoritative, but it’s huge and filled with almost too much detail. Lynne Truss’s Eat, Shoots, and Leaves and Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird are both wonderful books that are both informative and entertaining, but not quite so useful as reference books.
Now, Strunk and White (as it’s commonly called) is quite strict about some of its rules: don’t end sentences with a preposition, never start one with a conjunction, don’t split an infinitive. All rules (or suggestions) which common usage mostly lets slip these days. (How many non-writers do you know who even know what an infinitive is?) Its reputation is almost stodgy. A long list of rules and commands by two old, old men, you might think . . . and then you open it and start to read.
Now, it’s not a “readable” book in the same, conversational way of Truss and Lamotts’ books, but the quality of the writing is superb. E.B. White stresses simplicity in your writing, the importance of keeping your sentences crisp and active, and even in his explanations about when to use “lie” or “lay,” you can absolutely see the point. Who among us wouldn’t want to write as cleanly and vividly as E.B. White?
Then, of course, there’s the old adage that you need to know the rules to be able to break them. This should sound familiar because it seems to be one of my favorite themes. A writer can play with these rules, though, just as e.e. cummings played with capitalization, or Kent Haruf plays with quotation marks around his dialogue. It’s not that they did not know the rules, it’s that they chose to ignore them for effect. As Mr. Strunk and Mr. White say, “Style takes its final shape more from attitudes of mind than from principles of composition, for, as an elderly practitioner once remarked, ‘Writing is an act of faith, not a trick of grammar.'”
And that’s the point. Strunk and White is possibly the very best place you can learn the rules.
I am curious about your usage of ‘a vast majority’ in the second sentence. It doesn’t seem quite right, and ‘It’s reputation’ in the second to last sentence of the fourth paragraph very much surprised me. If you’d prefer that I not make these comments, please say so. I enjoy proofreading, but I’m not a particularly good writer.
(Oops. I can’t believe I missed that “it’s”–how embarrassing! This is what I get for not proof-reading more carefully in my zeal to get this UP. Sheesh.)
There are so many rules I finally got into my head because of Strunk and White. Fine gentlemen, both! I worry that someday rules will have changed so much that S&W will no longer be the standard text…
That is the best book EVER. I was never so pleased in all my life as when my daughter was handed a hard-covered one at matriculation at Hamilton College. I knew then that we had made the right college choice. I was a little less pleased when my daughter (who had made a point of telling me about receiving it, knowing it is my bible) brought it home and left it here when she came home from her first college break. As far as I know, she never looked at it again. *sigh*
Then again, when she always has Mama to ask, why does she need to look in the book?
But I so agree with you about having to know the rules in order to break them for effect. I do that often in my writing, but sometimes I worry that people will not realize that I’m using a device for its laugh factor…
I loved Spunk and Bite. For someone keeping a blog or anyone writing on the internet, I find this new take on style very refreshing. Strunk and White got me through university so I remain grateful to it too.
Strunk and White – ah yes, my old arch-nemeses.
I used to get my college papers back with red ink and Strunk and White references all over them. 🙂
But that book has done more for my writing skills than almost any other book of which I know.
I have to admit to using The Elements of Style as a reference, but it’s worth noting that many prominent linguists have nothing but loathing for Strunk and White, arguing that their rules are not always supported by the way English is and has been used. My favourite is this post, which calls the book a “vile little compendium of tripe”. But I agree with you that the TEoS is often more conenient to use than the CMoS.
Pingback: Punctuality Rules! » Blog Archive » MM: Brighten Up
Pingback: Punctuality Rules! » Blog Archive » Context
Hello.
Apparently this post has had the good fortune to finally be discussed on Language Log.
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=104
Strunk and White- is great book. I read it again and again.
I have the fourth edition of Strunk and White and it says that use of a preposition is fine when it sounds better at the end of the sentence.