<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MM: Jargon</title>
	<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/</link>
	<description>Help for a Punctual and Polite Life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: --Deb</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-662</link>
		<author>--Deb</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Now you've got me doing it . . . jargon, jargon, jargon, jargon....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you&#8217;ve got me doing it . . . jargon, jargon, jargon, jargon&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy H.</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-661</link>
		<author>Judy H.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with everything you said.  Jargon out of place is a waste of words.

But, in fiction, jargon can be the detail that makes your characters come alive!  You have to be careful that the jargon is explained by context, but a cop needs to talk like a cop, a lawyer like a lawyer, etc.

(Oh, and Melissa's right.  Jargon is a fun word to say.  Jargon, jargon, jargon...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with everything you said.  Jargon out of place is a waste of words.</p>
<p>But, in fiction, jargon can be the detail that makes your characters come alive!  You have to be careful that the jargon is explained by context, but a cop needs to talk like a cop, a lawyer like a lawyer, etc.</p>
<p>(Oh, and Melissa&#8217;s right.  Jargon is a fun word to say.  Jargon, jargon, jargon&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-660</link>
		<author>Robyn</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-660</guid>
		<description>Deb, I've had this feeling about jargon a long time.  When in my doctoral program, there was specific language I had to learn, because at times focused on complex processes, for instance.   These words could be picked up and understood by others in the field who read academic journals.  However, when writing to a general audience academics leave this kind of jargon behind [hopefully].  So, I guess that it depends on what you are writing and for whom.

&lt;em&gt;Robyn's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://brainbasedbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/let-me-pick-your-brain.html' rel="nofollow"&gt;Let Me Pick Your Brain!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb, I&#8217;ve had this feeling about jargon a long time.  When in my doctoral program, there was specific language I had to learn, because at times focused on complex processes, for instance.   These words could be picked up and understood by others in the field who read academic journals.  However, when writing to a general audience academics leave this kind of jargon behind [hopefully].  So, I guess that it depends on what you are writing and for whom.</p>
<p><em>Robyn&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://brainbasedbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/let-me-pick-your-brain.html' rel="nofollow">Let Me Pick Your Brain!</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: --Deb</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-659</link>
		<author>--Deb</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Well, okay, Melissa, I'll admit that it's a fun word to SAY (grin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, okay, Melissa, I&#8217;ll admit that it&#8217;s a fun word to SAY (grin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Donovan</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-658</link>
		<author>Melissa Donovan</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-658</guid>
		<description>Jargon is one of those words that I love. Something about it really appeals to me. However, I have been a victim of industry jargon and I can tell you it is not pleasant when someone rambles on about TCP reports and you have only been with the company for a week and have no idea what the heck TCP stands for. Grr. But still, I love that word!

&lt;em&gt;Melissa Donovan's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WritingForward/~3/277480969/breifs-are-not-just-underwear' rel="nofollow"&gt;Briefs are Not Just Underwear&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jargon is one of those words that I love. Something about it really appeals to me. However, I have been a victim of industry jargon and I can tell you it is not pleasant when someone rambles on about TCP reports and you have only been with the company for a week and have no idea what the heck TCP stands for. Grr. But still, I love that word!</p>
<p><em>Melissa Donovan&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WritingForward/~3/277480969/breifs-are-not-just-underwear' rel="nofollow">Briefs are Not Just Underwear</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: --Deb</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-657</link>
		<author>--Deb</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Clearly, a legal brief needs to be written in legalese, I accept that. But outside a professional arena? It's like a police officer talking like he's writing a report, when he answers the question "How was your day?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, a legal brief needs to be written in legalese, I accept that. But outside a professional arena? It&#8217;s like a police officer talking like he&#8217;s writing a report, when he answers the question &#8220;How was your day?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lillie Ammann</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-656</link>
		<author>Lillie Ammann</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Deb,
The use of jargon is one of my pet peeves. I've just been working on a style guide for a client, and I made sure to say not to use jargon unless the document is for internal use only.

&lt;em&gt;Lillie Ammann's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://lillieammann.com/blog/2008/04/28/read-and-comment-day/' rel="nofollow"&gt;Read and Comment Day&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb,<br />
The use of jargon is one of my pet peeves. I&#8217;ve just been working on a style guide for a client, and I made sure to say not to use jargon unless the document is for internal use only.</p>
<p><em>Lillie Ammann&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://lillieammann.com/blog/2008/04/28/read-and-comment-day/' rel="nofollow">Read and Comment Day</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice Cartier</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-655</link>
		<author>Janice Cartier</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-655</guid>
		<description>Hey Deb- this looks great...do I recognize you from TS ? All best, Jan

&lt;em&gt;Janice Cartier's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cartier/paintings/~3/279378049/for-audubons-birds-and-kids-of-gulf.html' rel="nofollow"&gt;For Audubon's Birds And The Kids Of The Gulf Coast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Deb- this looks great&#8230;do I recognize you from TS ? All best, Jan</p>
<p><em>Janice Cartier&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cartier/paintings/~3/279378049/for-audubons-birds-and-kids-of-gulf.html' rel="nofollow">For Audubon&#8217;s Birds And The Kids Of The Gulf Coast</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Swim</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-654</link>
		<author>Karen Swim</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-654</guid>
		<description>Deb, you're so right! Heavy use of acronyms and insider jargon (not written for insiders) leaves me feeling that the writer was filled with self importance.  It takes far more thought, in my opinion to simplify and make your words accessible to a wider audience.

&lt;em&gt;Karen Swim's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WordsForHire/~3/278298228/student-his-way-out-of-egyptian-jail.html' rel="nofollow"&gt;Student 'Twitters' his way out of Egyptian jail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb, you&#8217;re so right! Heavy use of acronyms and insider jargon (not written for insiders) leaves me feeling that the writer was filled with self importance.  It takes far more thought, in my opinion to simplify and make your words accessible to a wider audience.</p>
<p><em>Karen Swim&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WordsForHire/~3/278298228/student-his-way-out-of-egyptian-jail.html' rel="nofollow">Student &#8216;Twitters&#8217; his way out of Egyptian jail</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: --Deb</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-653</link>
		<author>--Deb</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://punctualityrules.com/2008/04/28/mm-jargon/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>@Karen--One would certainly hope so! Because, well, that's what communicating is FOR. Some people just seem to take it as a challenge, to make it as obscure as possible. Those are the kinds of people who like to know secrets just for the sake of knowing them.... (grin)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karen&#8211;One would certainly hope so! Because, well, that&#8217;s what communicating is FOR. Some people just seem to take it as a challenge, to make it as obscure as possible. Those are the kinds of people who like to know secrets just for the sake of knowing them&#8230;. (grin)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
