<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MM: Labor Pains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/</link>
	<description>Using Grammar and Good Manners to Save the World</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Punctuality Rules! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MM: You&#8217;re Kidding</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Punctuality Rules! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MM: You&#8217;re Kidding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>[...] you want to say, &#8220;You are,&#8221; you write &#8220;you&#8217;re.&#8221; It&#8217;s a contraction of the two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #; margin-left: 3em; padding: 1em 1em 1em 2em; ">
<p>[...] you want to say, &#8220;You are,&#8221; you write &#8220;you&#8217;re.&#8221; It&#8217;s a contraction of the two [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillian</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Playing around, we used to say amn't at home occasionally, but it's another one that I've never written.

DH and I are both bilingual, Fr &#38; Eng, and we have good exposure to several other languages.  He went to school in French as well, so we sometimes play with language.  We often say 'Andiamo' from Italian for 'let's go.' and refer to a really bad traffic jam as a 'stau' from German because it conveys a clear picture of standstill for miles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playing around, we used to say amn&#8217;t at home occasionally, but it&#8217;s another one that I&#8217;ve never written.</p>
<p>DH and I are both bilingual, Fr &amp; Eng, and we have good exposure to several other languages.  He went to school in French as well, so we sometimes play with language.  We often say &#8216;Andiamo&#8217; from Italian for &#8216;let&#8217;s go.&#8217; and refer to a really bad traffic jam as a &#8217;stau&#8217; from German because it conveys a clear picture of standstill for miles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktel60</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>ktel60</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Kurt Vonnegut once held forth in an essay about "amn't I", concluding that the phrasing "Am I not" was more elegant and understandable, notwithstanding the possibility of being mistaken for a maiden aunt. (The mustache would have been a give-away, at any rate.) Don't ask me for a citation, but I know it's there.  

I spotted this on a sign outside a friend's office: "Smile, your being recorded on video".  "My what is being recorded on video?" I asked him.  "Your helping move out in the dark of night" he replied.  

Quick on the uptake he is,  my old buddy Vince.  (The Irish in me, I think it is, that causes me to turn around my syntax from time to time.)

As ever,

JC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt Vonnegut once held forth in an essay about &#8220;amn&#8217;t I&#8221;, concluding that the phrasing &#8220;Am I not&#8221; was more elegant and understandable, notwithstanding the possibility of being mistaken for a maiden aunt. (The mustache would have been a give-away, at any rate.) Don&#8217;t ask me for a citation, but I know it&#8217;s there.  </p>
<p>I spotted this on a sign outside a friend&#8217;s office: &#8220;Smile, your being recorded on video&#8221;.  &#8220;My what is being recorded on video?&#8221; I asked him.  &#8220;Your helping move out in the dark of night&#8221; he replied.  </p>
<p>Quick on the uptake he is,  my old buddy Vince.  (The Irish in me, I think it is, that causes me to turn around my syntax from time to time.)</p>
<p>As ever,</p>
<p>JC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Pearce</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I've never seen "amn't"  before either.

What I have seen sometimes is somebody putting the apostrophe in the wrong place. A day or two ago I saw "do'nt" rather than "don't". I'd hesitate calling it a rule, but the apostrophe stands in place of the removed letters and not between the two words, where those two things differ, if that makes sense.

There are exceptions, though. One of those is "shan't", which if you followed my "rule" would be "sha'n't".

The best way to learn this stuff? Read widely and have an eye for detail. Oh, and start really young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen &#8220;amn&#8217;t&#8221;  before either.</p>
<p>What I have seen sometimes is somebody putting the apostrophe in the wrong place. A day or two ago I saw &#8220;do&#8217;nt&#8221; rather than &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221;. I&#8217;d hesitate calling it a rule, but the apostrophe stands in place of the removed letters and not between the two words, where those two things differ, if that makes sense.</p>
<p>There are exceptions, though. One of those is &#8220;shan&#8217;t&#8221;, which if you followed my &#8220;rule&#8221; would be &#8220;sha&#8217;n't&#8221;.</p>
<p>The best way to learn this stuff? Read widely and have an eye for detail. Oh, and start really young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Shorr</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Shorr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/19/mm-labor-pains/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>1. I've never seen the word "amn't" before. Is it acceptable for general purpose writing? 2. BTW, thank you for visiting my Scrambled Toast blog - I accidentally deleted your comment, but was glad to hear you liked the list. 3. I just subscribed to your blog - these grammar posts are just what I need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I&#8217;ve never seen the word &#8220;amn&#8217;t&#8221; before. Is it acceptable for general purpose writing? 2. BTW, thank you for visiting my Scrambled Toast blog - I accidentally deleted your comment, but was glad to hear you liked the list. 3. I just subscribed to your blog - these grammar posts are just what I need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
