<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MM: Emphasis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/</link>
	<description>Using Grammar and Good Manners to Save the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:26:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy H.</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Yay!  Thank you for addressing this one, Deb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!  Thank you for addressing this one, Deb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktel60</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>ktel60</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>S&amp;W are down on the use of the exclamation mark under any circumstances.  Seriously, if your writing isn&#039;t compelling, exclamatioon marks only underline its essential banality. (Notice sterling use of apostrophes).

Of course so far as I&#039;m concerned Strunk and White are trumps; like Smith and Wesson, they beat four aces.  

One thing I lament, though.  In Spanish [at least, I believe the rule holds for Portuguese and Italian (3d languages for me)] an exclamation of interrogative is both proceeded and followed by eccentric punctuation.  That is to say adn inverted exclamation or question mark.  Perhaps this has something to do with having to do cold readings for stage and broadcast, but it does serve as fair warning.  Imagine if the long-winded questioners in (e.g.) political chat shows were required to let one know that what was being said was in fact a question, rather than an extended editorial comment.  The world might come to a screeching halt, allowing me to get off.

Hope the shingles are moving along satisfactorily, to wit to the roof (where they belong) and off your suffering bod.

Your friend,

JC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;W are down on the use of the exclamation mark under any circumstances.  Seriously, if your writing isn&#8217;t compelling, exclamatioon marks only underline its essential banality. (Notice sterling use of apostrophes).</p>
<p>Of course so far as I&#8217;m concerned Strunk and White are trumps; like Smith and Wesson, they beat four aces.  </p>
<p>One thing I lament, though.  In Spanish [at least, I believe the rule holds for Portuguese and Italian (3d languages for me)] an exclamation of interrogative is both proceeded and followed by eccentric punctuation.  That is to say adn inverted exclamation or question mark.  Perhaps this has something to do with having to do cold readings for stage and broadcast, but it does serve as fair warning.  Imagine if the long-winded questioners in (e.g.) political chat shows were required to let one know that what was being said was in fact a question, rather than an extended editorial comment.  The world might come to a screeching halt, allowing me to get off.</p>
<p>Hope the shingles are moving along satisfactorily, to wit to the roof (where they belong) and off your suffering bod.</p>
<p>Your friend,</p>
<p>JC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guilty of using lots of multiple punctuation on my blog. But only when I&#039;m excited!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guilty of using lots of multiple punctuation on my blog. But only when I&#8217;m excited!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctualityrules.com/2007/11/12/mm-emphasis/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I find that I use the dash much too often.  In fact, what I really use is a hyphen before and after a clause (-) as opposed to an actual dash (--).  It&#039;s a terrible habit and I can&#039;t seem to stop myself from doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that I use the dash much too often.  In fact, what I really use is a hyphen before and after a clause (-) as opposed to an actual dash (&#8211;).  It&#8217;s a terrible habit and I can&#8217;t seem to stop myself from doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

